The DACA program, providing temporary deportation protection and work authorization for nearly 600,000 “Dreamers,” has faced ongoing legal challenges since its start in 2012. Strict eligibility criteria apply, and major court cases have created uncertainty about the program’s future for those who call America home.
What Is DACA and Why Does It Matter?
President Obama created DACA through executive action in 2012 after Congress failed to pass comprehensive immigration reform. The program doesn’t provide a path to citizenship, but it offers temporary relief from deportation and allows recipients to work legally in the United States.
To qualify for DACA, applicants must demonstrate they:
- Arrived in the US before their 16th birthday
- Have continuously resided in the US since June 15, 2007
- Were under 31 years old as of June 15, 2012
- Are currently in school, graduated high school, or are honorably discharged veterans
- Have not been convicted of serious crimes
DACA recipients contribute significantly to the American economy. They work as teachers, healthcare workers, engineers, and small business owners. Many have built families and deep community ties over decades of residence.
Major Court Cases Shaping DACA’s Future
University of California v. DHS (2017-2018)
When the Trump administration announced plans to terminate DACA in September 2017, multiple states and organizations filed lawsuits. The University of California case became one of the most significant challenges.
Federal judges in California, New York, and Washington D.C. issued nationwide injunctions blocking the termination. These courts ruled that the administration’s decision was “arbitrary and capricious” under the Administrative Procedure Act, requiring the government to continue processing DACA renewals.
The Supreme Court eventually heard this case in 2019, leading to a landmark decision in June 2020. In Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, the Court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration’s attempt to end DACA was procedurally flawed. However, the Court didn’t rule on whether DACA itself was legal—only that the administration hadn’t followed proper procedures to terminate it.
Texas v. United States (2018-Present)
Texas, along with eight other states, filed a separate lawsuit challenging DACA’s legality from the ground up. Unlike the University of California case, which focused on procedural issues, Texas v. United States argued that DACA was unconstitutional and exceeded executive authority.
In July 2021, federal Judge Andrew Hanen ruled that DACA was unlawful, blocking new applications while allowing existing recipients to maintain their status and renew their protections. This created a two-tiered system where current recipients could stay protected, but new applicants couldn’t join the program.
The case continues to work its way through the courts, with the Biden administration appealing the decision. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has heard arguments, and the case may eventually reach the Supreme Court again.
Trump Administration Legal Challenges
Beyond attempting to terminate DACA entirely, the Trump administration faced numerous legal challenges over program modifications. Courts consistently ruled against attempts to:
- Shorten renewal periods from two years to one year
- Restrict travel authorization for DACA recipients
- Implement additional background check requirements
These cases established important precedents about how immigration programs can be modified and what procedures the government must follow when making changes.
Current Legal Status: A Complex Landscape
DACA’s current legal status reflects years of court battles and changing administrations. Here’s where things stand:
For Current Recipients: Those who already have DACA can continue renewing their status every two years, thanks to court injunctions that remain in effect. The Biden administration has maintained the program and encouraged eligible individuals to renew.
For New Applicants: The situation is more complicated. While the Biden administration announced it would accept new applications, the Texas ruling blocks first-time applicants from receiving approval. This has created a significant backlog of pending applications.
Program Improvements: The Biden administration has taken steps to strengthen DACA, including restoring the program to its original 2012 terms and providing clearer guidance on eligibility requirements.
Immigration lawyers like those in Salt Lake City often advise eligible individuals to prepare applications even during periods of uncertainty, as legal landscapes can change quickly.
Impact on Recipients and Communities
The legal uncertainty surrounding DACA has created significant stress for recipients and their families. Many live in constant fear that court decisions could suddenly change their status.
Economic Contributions: DACA recipients contribute an estimated $42 billion annually to the U.S. gross domestic product. They pay taxes, start businesses, and fill critical roles in essential industries, particularly healthcare and education.
Educational Achievement: Studies show that DACA recipients have high rates of educational attainment, with many pursuing advanced degrees and professional careers. The program’s work authorization allows them to fully utilize their education and skills.
Family Stability: Many DACA recipients have U.S. citizen children and spouses. Legal uncertainty affects entire families, not just individual recipients. Some recipients have lived in the United States for over 20 years, making America their only true home.
Mental Health: The constant legal battles have taken a psychological toll. Research indicates higher rates of anxiety and depression among DACA recipients compared to other young adults, largely due to ongoing uncertainty about their future.
Looking Ahead: Potential Solutions
Legislative Options
Congress remains the most promising avenue for permanent solutions. Several bills have been introduced that would provide pathways to citizenship for DACA recipients:
- The Dream Act would provide conditional permanent residence leading to full citizenship
- The Farm Workforce Modernization Act includes provisions for agricultural workers
- Comprehensive immigration reform packages often include DACA recipient protections
However, partisan divisions have prevented passage of these measures despite bipartisan public support for helping DACA recipients.
Executive Actions
The Biden administration has explored strengthening DACA through executive action, but options are limited by ongoing litigation and constitutional constraints. Any significant changes likely require legislative approval.
Court Outcomes
The ongoing Texas case will significantly impact DACA’s future. Possible outcomes include:
- Complete invalidation of the program
- Upholding current restrictions on new applicants
- Full restoration of DACA’s original scope
- Supreme Court review providing definitive guidance
Conclusion
DACA recipients contribute significantly to their communities and deserve permanent protections. While courts offer temporary solutions, lasting change requires Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform. Supporting permanent DACA legislation benefits both humanitarian and economic interests. Contact your representatives to advocate for lasting solutions.
Also Read-Slip and Fall Injuries: How Temple Injury Law Protects Victims
